http://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/findings/national/collenfG.html
Keep clicking on the arrows at the bottom to the right
and scroll thru a bunch of screens. Here are some interesting
things:
- IRS did ½ million liens roughly
per year
- IRS did roughly ½ million levies
per year. [Wanna wager most of these are filed against employers and most are
unchallenged?]
- Check out the Seizures_take note
of the scale_the scale is now in thousands and you will see if rock bottom.
Essentially NADA_zippo.
- 500 people were prosecuted in 2001
for federal taxes. Yes_that is NOT millions or thousands!! Just 500.
[Now bear in mind I wager most haven_t gone to the extent of even
reliance defense_] and only 250 were targeted for either tax evasion or
willful failure to file.
- Roughly 500 people got a civil suit by the IRS.
- Over 125 MILLION returns were filed.
- The total number of IRS staff is 100 thousand.
- There are only 3000 criminal investigators.
Now take the 500 people who were prosecution-targeted by
the IRS and divide it by 125 million and you get some
statistics:
- You have a 0.0004% chance of being a target by the IRS
for prosecution based on the number of filers. Expressed another way, the odds
of IRS prosecution, based on the number of filers is 1 in 250,000.
- The 1 year odds of death as an occupant of a car are 1
in 18,000. http://www.nsc.org/lrs/statinfo/odds.htm
- Summing up all the ways to die by accident, the odds
of death by accident in 1 year is 1 in 1743.
- The odds of getting struck by lightning in 1 year are
1 in 400,000. http://www.lightningsafety.noaa.gov/medical.htm
Based on either prosecution for either willful failure to file and/or tax evasion, you have better odds at getting struck by lightning: 1 in 500,000 vs 1 in 400,000 for lightning.
Wharton
http://www.fourwinds10.com:80/NewsServer/ArticleFunctions/ArticleDetails.php?ArticleID=16791
Loma
Wharton's Brilliant Presentation of "Notice of Federal Tax Lien"
August
18, 2007
A
nation that will not stand up for it's rights, soon has none.
Click on "Visit
Author's Website" or use this LINK:
mms://media.co.douglas.or.us/Archive/BOC_Regular_public_Meeting_08_08_2007.wmv
Download Link: http://media.co.douglas.or.us/BOC_Regular_public_Meeting_08_08_2007.wmv
Douglas
After you pull up one of the links, either the
View or Download ones, move your Media Players content time slider over to the 8
Min mark to start watching Loma Wharton's presentation. Watch it to the end.
This is unbelievable and needs to
be downloaded and given to all elected officials on the county level.
Curious about
what started the
Well here it is... I just got off the phone with Loma Wharton,
she's the woman who so eloquently buried the sheriff and the commissioners with
her presentation, she told me this is what fired it off. I'll be having her on
my show in the next several weeks, so be prepared. I'm also getting a copy of
the papers she served on that county's LIARS and CHEATS...
IN THE OFFICE
OF THE
AN OPEN
LETTER TO ALL SHERIFF(s) ACROSS
1.. A "Notice
of Tax Lien" filed at the County Recorders Office in an alphabetical Index of
Tax Liens.
2.. A State Statute (in
3.. A levy which
arises out of a missing lien instrument. Understand thata "Notice of Lien" is
NOT a Lien.
4.. A Lien instrument which fails to contain the necessary
elements which are required to create a valid Lien in Commerce.
5.. A Levy
that fails to contain the actual Lien itself. Remember if you have no valid lien
you cannot have a valid/lawfu1 levy.
The I.R.S., being the cowards that they are, always get somebody
else to do their dirty work for them and incur their liability. In the process
of execution of Levy enforcement they turn to the Sheriff(s) and involve
the
Sheriff into joining them in the commission of the crime by fraud by inducement
and by execution on the defective Levy.
Now take a close look at what the State Statute says and does. RCW
60.68.045, entitled as the Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act {formerly Lien
for Internal Revenue Taxes-copy attached} which I understand goes back
59 years to
when it was enacted in 1934, orders the
Entering a "Notice" of Lien in an alphabetical tax lien index
doesn't make that "Notice of Lien", a "Lien", any more than entering a 4 year
old child in an index of seasoned Police veterans makes the 4 year old child a
seasoned Police veteran. And the fraud is monumental because for 59 years the
IRS has been seizing the assets of Americans with no lawful Lien and has been
inducing and intimidating the badge holding, oath [contract] (to uphold the
Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic) taking Sheriff an
unknowing accessory. The I.R.S. gets the money and the Sheriff gets the personal
liability, endangerment from a defrauded/levied family, scorn from the
neighborhood that at least partially understands that a theft is occurring, and
the shaft from the I.R.S.. This becomes evident when the Sheriff expects full
scale legal backing from the I.R.S. after a victimized family commercially liens
the Sheriff(s) and his marital community's personal assets for participating in
the theft and the I.R.S . says to the County expecting legal backup, Ha... you
volunteered. I know that you Sheriff(S) don't enjoy being played for fools and
patsies anymore than I do, and if I were in your position, the next time an
I.R.S. agent directed you to help him/her enforce a so-called "Tax Levy" without
a valid Lien, I would slap him/her in cuffs and arrest them for attempting to
implicate you in the commission of a crime.
You recognize a valid commercial Lien, WHICH INCLUDES VALID TAX
LIENS, by understanding that a valid tax Lien is required to contain these
necessary
elements:
1.. The lien instrument must evidently/patently/obviously be a
LIEN preferably by being formally and clearly titled "LIEN", "CLAIM OF LIEN",
"DECLARATION OF LIEN", or "AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION" and MANDATORILY by its
exhaustive commercial content (full disclosure} as follows in (2), (3), and (4).
2.. The lien must contain an Affidavit containing a plain statement of fact
disclosing how the obligation of the lien was created, established, or arose. 3.
The lien must contain a ledger or bookkeeping statement connecting purchases,
services rendered, and/or injuries sustained with a claim of obligation such
that each purchase, service and/or injury is presented in a one-to-one
correspondence with its partial claim or obligation. The partial obligations are
then totaled to obtain the total obligation. This is called a True Bill in
Commerce or an Itemized Statement. 4.. The Lien must contain a statement, either
specific or general, of the property being seized from the Lien Debtor to
satisfy, or to guarantee satisfaction of, the obligation of the Lien. 5.. The
Lien (Affidavit of Obligation) mandates the necessity of the hand signed and
notarized signature of the Affiant attesting to the validity of the Affidavit as
being "true", "correct" and "certain" and the signature also affixes the
responsibi1ity for the truthfulness, accuracy and certainty of the claim on the
doorstep of the Affiant. The reason that the I.R.S. agents don't file valid Tax
Liens is that without the complete paperwork package they escape any liability
to themselves, and get the fraud/theft job performed by the Sheriff, who is left
with a personal financial liability to both himself and the estate of his
marital community, takes the physical threat of endangerment, the possibility of
imprisonment for being the accessory in a crime and the shaft from the I.R.S..
And if the I.R.S. Agent(s) "tip" you for the good job you did for them they heap
more shame and liabi1lty on you and draw you further into their web of
corruption.
One of the duties that the commercial public expects from the
Officeholder of Sheriff of the County is the enforcement of a valid commercial
levy.
Sheriff(s) throughout
and/or possessions, it is the Sheriff's
responsibility and duty to recognize the SCAM and stop the fraud.
Please understand Sheriff(s), that you are NOT required to obey
the "directives" of ANY organization, governmental or otherwise, that is
criminal in its basic behavior. In fact, where American citizens are required
under threat of fines and jail time if he/she does not report criminal behavior
(Misprision of Felony), the Sheriff has the greater responsibility and duty to
arrest the I.R.S. agent who would drag the Sheriff(s) into the commission of a
crime against those American citizens' (We The People) who have hired those
Sheriff(s) to protect thelr rights.
You may be more inclined, even happy, to put these I.R.S. criminal
bums into the crowbar motel (prisons) where they belong. Happy hunting fellow
badge holder ....Go get them.
Since you are probably wondering hov to maintain your Counties'
tax base that pays your salaries...I.R.S. agents don't collect much, if
anything, in the way of taxes. That however, is another closely related subject
which I can cover at a later date if you are interested. The support of your
department comes from duties, imposts, tariffs, excises, gasoline and real
estate taxes. Federal Revenue sharing, mostly, only brings bureaucratic
constraints, regulations and dictates from the far distant "Malfunction
Junction" (Washington, D.C.) and eliminates the local control of the police
powers which Constitutionally reside in the " LOCAL COUNTY SHERIFF". For further
enlightenment read "Anderson On Sheriffs".
If you check
out the Notice 609 that is usually provided with your 1040 Form entitled Privacy
Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice you will discover that the I.R.S. may
give the information which you provide on your 1040 to foreign governments
because of tax treaties they have with the
A law enforcement officer will lose his bond if he oppresses a
citizen to the point of civil rebellion when that citizen attempts to peaceably
obtain a redress of grievances (U. S. Constitution-First Article-Bill of
Rights).
When a State, by and through its officials and agents deprives a
citizen of all his remedies by the due process of law and deprives said citizen
of the equal protection of the law, the State commits an act of "Mixed War"
against the citizen. The citizen has the right to recognize this act, on the
part of the State by the publication of a "Solemn Recognition of Mixed War". The
Sheriff is the Chief Executive of the County, superior to the Governor, the
President of the
Stop the fraud. For example, every Commerclal Search Warrant must
have attached to it a commercial Affidavit which is known by the name of
"probable cause". This gives the commercial grounds for seizing/levying on the
property owner indicated on the warrant. A Search Warrant lacking a commercial
Affidavlt of probable cause is known as a letter of Marque and Reprisal and is
an instrument of Martial Law or Mixed War, NOT a Judicial Process. Also, a
warrant must be specific as to the person or place being searched and the things
belng seized, so a search warrant cannot contain an indefinite range by any
wording meaning "et cetera", or "etc." It is also the Sheriff's responsibility
to trace the path of all material seized by Warrant to guarantee that they do
not simply become divided up as the spoils of war.
A solemn recognition of "Mixed War" is an instrument which
contains a criminal complaint that includes an "Affidavit of Information",
......On or about......"date"........, ......"did unlawfully".....,
........"committed as follows"....... and sworn declaration that the State has
denied the party all civilized remedies for his/her problem. The universal
format for writing a Solemn Recognition of Mixed War, is the well known example
of such an instrument known as the Declaration of Independence.
The I.R.S. collection process is commercially legitimate. The
I.R.S. assessment process is a commercial fraud because it is not supported by
commercial Affidavit of Obligation (Liens).
American citizens, wronged by employers, municipalities, County
Recorders Offices, County governments, State governments, Federal Judges,
Legislators and Sheriff(s) enforcing and implementing fraudulent I.R.S . levies,
are fair game for commercial Liens and all of the losses that go with them.
I don't like to see my fellow badge holders get hurt...which is
the reason for sharing the information in this letter. For further information
please write to me at the mailing address below.
Yours for a
better
JIM SHAVER
Mailing address: James E. (Jim) Shaver, Sr. c/o
#172
Phone: (206) 244-7359 [NOTE: now (509) 684-7777]
STATE OF
Subscribed
and attested to before me this 29th day of March, 1993. NOTARY PUBLIC, in and
for the STATE of
MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES: 1-3-96
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No law compels a work eligible man or woman to submit a form W-4
or W-9(or their equivalent) nor disclose an SSN as a condition of being hired or
keeping one's job. With the exception of an order from a court of competent
jurisdiction issued by a duly qualified judge, no amounts can be lawfully taken
from one's pay (for taxes, fees or other charges) without the worker's explicit,
knowing, voluntary, written consent. http://www.preferredservices.org/NonconsentualTaking.html
Hauert
Willful
Failure to File Indictment DISMISSED!
Transcript
Hauert was indicted on five counts Sec.7203 WILLFUL
FAILURE etc. Hauert wanted to know the OFFENSE statute he was accused of
violating and would then submit his plea.
Hauert wanted to know the particular statute that made
him the person required to pay the income tax. His attorney (addressing the
judge) "The prosecution has been trying to get my client to plea bargain. My
client is interested but has a few demands of the prosecution in order to
understand the charges and determine the potential guilt. He has a serious
question that nobody will address. Will the court entertain that
question?"
Judge: "Certainly."
Hauert: "Your honor, Section 7203 of the I.R. Code is a
DISCIPLINARY STATUTE. It defines the penalty for someone who has broken the law.
I need to know the underlying offense statute that is used to determine if I am
the "any person" required to file. The term "any person" is ambiguous.
Judge: "I don't know what he is asking for." (Looking at Prosecutor) Do you know what
he's asking for?"
Prosecutor: "No, your honor, I don't know what he's
asking for either."
Judge: "I am not knowledgeable of every law and can't
be." (Hey, isn't he presumed to to
know the law?)
Hauert: Could you please bring me the I.R. Code book
with 7203 in it so I can show you what I am talking about. (Note: The clerk brought in the I.R.Code
book.)
Judge: (Reading Sec. 7203) "Any person required under
this title to pay any estimated tax or tax, or required by this title or by
regulations made under authority thereof to make a return, keep any records, or
supply any information, who willfully fails to pay such estimated tax or tax,
make such return..."
Judge: "Sounds clear to me."
NOTE: (In the words
of Hauert) "I looked at the prosecuting attorney and criminal investigator
looking business-like and smiling confidently and I thought, these suckers have
gotten to the judge."
Hauert: "May I see the book?
(
NOTE: (In the words
of Hauert: "I then handed the judge back the book. Looking perplexed, the judge
read those words over and over again for what felt like an eternity.")
Judge: "So what you're asking for, Mr. Hauert, is the
Statute, referred to in Section 7203, that makes a person liable for the tax and
subject to the penalties imposed by Section 7203?"
Hauert: "Yes, that's what I have been asking the
prosecutor for. I have also been asking the IRS the same question for several
years and no one will give me the Statute of law that I am accused of breaking."
NOTE: In one
sentence that would destroy the government's entire case.
Judge: "No problem, Mr. Prosecutor, I'm sure that you
can provide a copy of that statute."
Prosecutor: (Stammering and stuttering) "Um,
ohh...I'm...uh... not familiar
with...uh...that part of the code." (With that, the Prosecutor lost his business
like composure and the case was concluded. The
prosecutor was ordered to find someone who knew which
statute defined the offense.)
Hauert's attorney then requested a Bill of Particulars,
defining the specific offense statute that created the liability for Hauert to
pay the income tax and file a 1040 Tax Return. A Bill of Particulars is a
written statement of the SPECIFIC CHARGES against the defendant. This switched
the burden of proof back
to
the government to provide such a statute. After an extended period of time, the
prosecution still could not supply the court with the offense statute or
regulation that made Tom Hauert (or any American Citizen) the person made liable
to pay the S.1 graduated Income Tax (because no such statute exists).
Hauert, therefore, filed for and was granted a
dismissal!
*****************************************************************
No
law compels a work eligible man or woman to submit a form W-4 or W-9 (or their
equivalent) nor disclose an SSN as a condition of being hired or keeping ones
job. With the exception of an order from a court of competent jurisdiction
issued by a duly qualified judge, no amounts can be lawfully taken from
ones pay (for taxes, fees or other charges) without the
worker's explicit, knowing, voluntary, written consent.
http://www.preferredservices.org/NonconsentualTaking.html